Re: Serious bug in idl compiler (non-compiling generated files)

[Jules Colding <colding omesc com>]

Hi Michael,

On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 12:18 +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 12:17 +0100, Jules Colding wrote:
> > which is just plain ugly to read in a header file for a type where the
> > client is expected to do "switch()" on a const CORBA char.
> 
> 	The patch looks fine to me; assuming our regression tests pass (make
> check) - as you commit, can you add a sample like this to
> test/everything/everything.idl so we'll catch it in future ?.

OK, done.

> 
> 	Also - with libIDL one of the things I've often wanted to do is to
> write / steal a very small/simple pre-processor & have that built-in to
> avoid requiring invoking gpp [ also should bin forking 'indent' to make
> the output look nicer, it's really not necessary ], if you're interested
> that is :-)

Yes, but somewhat time constrained :-) 

Could you expand on your thoughts about indent?


Best regards,
  jules