Re: Is the ORBit2 stubs/skels breakage unacceptable?
- From: Marco Pesenti Gritti <mpeseng tin it>
- To: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- Cc: GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>,orbit-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Is the ORBit2 stubs/skels breakage unacceptable?
- Date: 28 Jun 2003 18:38:15 +0200
On Sat, 2003-06-28 at 18:04, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Jeff Waugh">
>
> > The stubs/skels stuff is a little unclear, because it's not really API or
> > ABI breakage, but it does mean that you cannot build software based on 2.0
> > and 2.2 on the new ORBit2 without changes to the tarball.
>
> Oh, the bits I forgot to mention: This *only* affects tarball builds (not
> CVS), because the stubs/skels are not regenerated. Perhaps that is a
> solution to the problem, I don't know. But I do know that you can't build
> the many hundreds of 2.0 and 2.2 based tarballs on ftp.gnome.org and other
> places (consider important apps such as Galeon and Evolution) on top of 2.3
> right now. :-)
Yelp regenerate the skels correctly, so I guess it's a Makefile problem
in some packages.
Btw it would be nice to document somewhere the right way to generate the
skels, every module seem to do it in a different way.
Marco
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]