Re: [G2R] heads up on 84897 and dependencies

[Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>]

On Mon, 2002-06-17 at 09:40, Michael Meeks wrote:
> 
> Argh,
> 
> On Sat, 2002-06-15 at 09:29, Bill Haneman wrote:
> > After some soul-searching, I think we should remove the oneway
> > directive.  Since we should then remove the ref() and the requirement
> > for the called server to unref() after servicing the call, this will
> > require changes to apps using our API (currently only apps under our
> > direct control, and GOK and gnopernicus).  However this means that.
> > despite bincompatibility, if we do this we should do it at 2.0.0 (i.e.
> > *now*) and not 2.0.1.
> 
> 	Argh - I realize now that this is correct; fuzzy thinking before. There
> will need to be API changes to AT's stuff.
> 
> 	I'd still go for shipping Gnome 2.0.0 now, with an Errata statement -
> that a11y event propagation will change for 2.0.1.

Fine by me, it RT agrees.

-Bill

> 	Regards,
> 
> 		Michael.
> 
> -- 
>  mmeeks@gnu.org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
>