Re: Event Service not complete?

[<dahaverk rockwellcollins com>]

Sounds like the even service should just be re-done then.  Should we use
the MICO event service
as a basis?  I'm inclined to think with all of it's C++ template usage the
ACE TAO event service might
be harder to turn into an "ORBit" event service.

I'm probably more interested in something along the line of the
Notification or Real-time Notification
service though.  I'm not sure right now what the status of the R-T
Notification work at the OMG is...
I think Iona, and OIS were the only responders to the OMG RFP for Real-time
notification.

-Dave

>Hi,
>
>On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 19:18, Michael Meeks wrote:
>> On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 16:41, dahaverk@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
>> > BTW,   I've built the "Event" service from ORBit 0.5.13 with ORBit2.
It
>> > seems to have built without any major problems.   I haven't
extensively
>> > tested it though.  I did remove it from the source tree of ORBit
0.5.13 and
>> > start making it a separate project.   That allowed me to use
"pkg-config"
>> > to link it to ORBit2
>>
>>   That's great - we should fold it back into the main tree I think;
Mark?
>>
>>   Could you post the code to me Dave ?
>
>Unless someone really implemented the event server for ORBit, which I
>don't think, there is no use in porting the event server from ORBit to
>ORBit2, because it just isn't even near an event server. It's just
>rotten code, that one day was intended to become an event server until I
>realized the problems with my approach and stopped doing it (cough,
>cough).
>
>Bye,
>Sebastian
>--
>Sebastian Wilhelmi