Re: [orbitcpp-list] Re: cpp branch: CORBA_Object struct hidden?

From: Richard Andrews <bbmaj7 yahoo com au>
To: murrayc usa net
Cc: orbit-list <orbit-list gnome org>,orbitcpp-list <orbitcpp-list lists sourceforge net>
Subject: Re: [orbitcpp-list] Re: cpp branch: CORBA_Object struct hidden?
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:48:25 +1100 (EST)

 --- Murray Cumming <murrayc@t-online.de> wrote: 
> > If you did inherit CORBA::Object privately from CORBA_Object,
> then
> > the same piece of memory could be used for C and C++ objects.
> 
> But the point is Why is this desirable?

I can't suggest any compelling reason. 
I think encapsulation is a better way to proceed. In the end, I think
trying to make CORBA_Object and CORBA::Object binary compatible will
break C++ type-safety.

http://movies.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Movies
- Vote for your nominees in our online Oscars pool.

References:
- Re: [orbitcpp-list] Re: cpp branch: CORBA_Object struct hidden?
  - From: Murray Cumming

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]