Re: [orbitcpp-list] Re: cpp branch: CORBA_Object struct hidden?
- From: murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming)
- To: Richard Andrews <bbmaj7 yahoo com au>
- Cc: Sam Couter <sam topic com au>, orbit-list <orbit-list gnome org>,orbitcpp-list <orbitcpp-list lists sourceforge net>
- Subject: Re: [orbitcpp-list] Re: cpp branch: CORBA_Object struct hidden?
- Date: 22 Feb 2002 01:48:37 +0100
On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 23:37, Richard Andrews wrote:
>
> > I can't think of any way of retaining this C <-> C++ compatibility
> > if
> > the CORBA_Object struct definition remains private and subject to
> > change. But I'm certainly not a C++ expert by any stretch of the
> > imagination.
> >
> > So... thoughts, anyone?
>
>
> More thinking aloud, if anyone still want to pursue this course...
>
> If you did inherit CORBA::Object privately from CORBA_Object, then
> the same piece of memory could be used for C and C++ objects.
But the point is Why is this desirable?
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc@usa.net
www.murrayc.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
