Re: Non-typedef'd arrays in IDL files
- From: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>
- To: Diego Sevilla Ruiz <dsevilla ditec um es>
- Cc: orbit-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Non-typedef'd arrays in IDL files
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 20:33:52 +0200 (CEST)
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Diego Sevilla Ruiz wrote:
> | classes and functions for arrays (like T_dup or T_out), which is of course
> | quite impossible without an explicit typedef.
>
> Also note that _dup is not a class, but an operation.
of course (I was aiming for an example of a utility class and an example
of a utility function). I've already implemented arrays -- I've just
realized today that there might be implicitly-created array types which
would break my code totally. I'm very glad that your reply turned out the
way it did.
--
.--= ULLA! =---------------------. `We are not here to give users what
\ http://cactus.rulez.org \ they want' -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
`---= cactus@cactus.rulez.org =---'
'You're the retardederest. You are the retardedest retard in Retardedtown.' -- seen on Badvogato
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]