Re: branch of ORBit deprecated ?

[Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com>]

On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, ERDI Gergo wrote:

> On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Elliot Lee wrote:
>
> > Use the stable branch, I guess. HEAD is a dead-end as far as I am
> > concerned...
>
> but there are a whole lot of functions only implemented in HEAD that
> ORBit/C++ requires...

"Too bad"?

I mean, I obviously can't stop you from using HEAD if you are determined,
but that line of development is never going to be released as far as I am
concerned, so it seems rather pointless to base any development on it.

-- Elliot
No new ideas for my .sig, and Alan told me my old one was an urban myth, so just
ignore this.