r7167 - dumbhippo/trunk/server/src/com/dumbhippo/dm/fetch
- From: commits mugshot org
- To: online-desktop-list gnome org
- Subject: r7167 - dumbhippo/trunk/server/src/com/dumbhippo/dm/fetch
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:53:17 -0600 (CST)
Author: otaylor
Date: 2008-01-09 16:53:17 -0600 (Wed, 09 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 7167
Modified:
dumbhippo/trunk/server/src/com/dumbhippo/dm/fetch/BoundFetch.java
Log:
Minor comment tweaks
Modified: dumbhippo/trunk/server/src/com/dumbhippo/dm/fetch/BoundFetch.java
===================================================================
--- dumbhippo/trunk/server/src/com/dumbhippo/dm/fetch/BoundFetch.java 2008-01-09 22:44:07 UTC (rev 7166)
+++ dumbhippo/trunk/server/src/com/dumbhippo/dm/fetch/BoundFetch.java 2008-01-09 22:53:17 UTC (rev 7167)
@@ -190,14 +190,18 @@
//
// * Expand '+' to '+;<property1> <property1 children>;<property2> ....'
// saves round trips at the expense of protocol efficiency, since the
- // client can know to short-circuit a later request for property1.
+ // client can know to short-circuit a later request for '<property1>'.
//
// * Add a '*' if all properties are fetched, to let the client know
// that fetches for additional properties will not succeed.
//
// * Omit properties from the fetch string that were previously sent.
// even if they are explicitly requested again. (We already do this
- // for property *values*, just not in the fetch string.)
+ // for property *values*, just not in the fetch string.) Compacts
+ // the protocol a bit.
+ //
+ // But for the case where most of our traffic is requests for '+',
+ // this simple approach works fine.
//
String fetchString = needFetch ? unboundFetch.toString() : null;
visitor.beginResource(classHolder, object.getKey(), fetchString, indirect);
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]