Re: Understanding IPv6-PD over PPPoE
- From: Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar gmail com>
- To: Beniamino Galvani <bgalvani redhat com>
- Cc: Steve Hill <steve opendium com>, Networkmanager List <networkmanager-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Understanding IPv6-PD over PPPoE
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:43:36 +0300
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:39 AM Beniamino Galvani via
networkmanager-list <networkmanager-list gnome org> wrote:
It feels as though NetworkManager should always be making both IA_NA and
IA_PD requests and, if it didn't receive an IA_NA response from the ISP, it
should assign an address from the delegated prefix to the PPP interface.
This would prevent the situation where a machine with no
"ipv6.method=shared" NICs ends up with no public v6 address at all.
Any insight would be appreciated - many thanks. :)
Hi,
as you have seen, currently NM only requests a prefix delegation when
there is an other interface in IPv6 shared mode. The IPv6 address on
the PPP interface itself can only be obtained via SLAAC or
DHCPv6(IA_NA), not via DHCPv6(IA_PD).
I'm not sure how the latter is common; to support it, NM would need to
always request a prefix delegation (even without another interface in
shared mode) or, better, to have a new option to make this behavior
configurable (for example, "ipv6.dhcp-request-pd=yes|no|auto").
It is explicitly prohibited to assign any IA_PD prefix to the same
interface via which this was obtained.
the requesting router MUST
NOT assign any delegated prefixes or subnets from the delegated
prefix(es) to the link through which it received the DHCP message
from the delegating router.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]