GNOME.org
 

RE: [ConCheck]: Connection check doesn't seem to work correctly

Hi Thomas,

Thanks for that information. Any idea what could be the problem? 

Anyway, I will try that 7.55.1 version and apply the patch to see if that might fix my problem. 

Best regards,
--
Mike Engel

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Haller [mailto:thaller redhat com] 
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 16:50
To: Engel, Mike; 'networkmanager-list gnome org'
Subject: Re: [ConCheck]: Connection check doesn't seem to work correctly

On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 12:57 +0000, Engel, Mike wrote:

Hi Thomas,

Thanks for your quick response. I use curl 7.50.1. I will try the 
latest one because I have seen the same time out reported in the bug 
you mentioned below.


Hi,

Supposedly 7.55 has the issue. So, if you use 7.50, then your issue is not the same as bgo#786432 and it's 
unclear what your issue is.

best,
Thomas



Once I have done some test I will update the thread.

Best regards,
--
Mike Engel

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Haller [mailto:thaller redhat com]
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 12:39
To: Engel, Mike; 'networkmanager-list gnome org'
Subject: Re: [ConCheck]: Connection check doesn't seem to work 
correctly

On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 10:23 +0000, Engel, Mike wrote:

Hi all,


Hi,



We are using the NetworkManager version 1.8.2 on an embedded device 
and have done some tests with the connection check and it seems that 
is not working correctly.

On our system we have Ethernet and wireless working. Were Ethernet 
is the primary network interface. Adding the connectivity check to 
the NetworkManager.conf will ping a server every 10s to check 
internet connection. And that is done correctly through both network 
interfaces.

Aug 28 09:40:38 ccimx6sbc daemon.debug NetworkManager[1354]:
<debug>
[1503913238.0883] connectivity: (eth0) sending request to 'http://n 
et work-test.debian.org/nm'
Aug 28 09:40:38 ccimx6sbc daemon.debug NetworkManager[1354]:
<debug>
[1503913238.0888] connectivity: (wlan0) sending request to 'http:// 
ne twork-test.debian.org/nm'
Aug 28 09:40:39 ccimx6sbc daemon.debug NetworkManager[1354]:
<debug>
[1503913239.4761] connectivity: (eth0) status header found, check 
successful Aug 28 09:40:39 ccimx6sbc daemon.debug
NetworkManager[1354]: <debug> [1503913239.4952] connectivity:
(wlan0)
status header found, check successful

The routing table of the target looks like this. 

Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric
Ref    Use Iface
0.0.0.0         10.101.2.1      0.0.0.0         UG    100    0     
  
 0 eth0
0.0.0.0         192.168.11.101  0.0.0.0         UG    600    0     
  
 0 wlan0
10.101.2.0      0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0     
  
 0 eth0
10.101.2.0      0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     100    0     
  
 0 eth0
192.168.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.0.0     U     0      0     
  
 0 wlan0
192.168.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.0.0     U     600    0     
  
 0 wlan0

When we disconnect the switch from the internet where the Ethernet 
interface is connected to the connection request will fail. But it 
fails for both devices and the routing penalization function
(route_metric_with_penalty) is called and updates the routing table 
for both interface instead of only the Ethernet one.

Aug 28 10:17:18 ccimx6sbc daemon.debug NetworkManager[1354]:
<debug>
[1503915438.0931] connectivity: (wlan0) sending request to 'http:// 
ne twork-test.debian.org/nm'
Aug 28 10:17:18 ccimx6sbc daemon.debug NetworkManager[1354]:
<debug>
[1503915438.0934] connectivity: (eth0) sending request to 'http://n 
et work-test.debian.org/nm'
Aug 28 10:18:39 ccimx6sbc daemon.debug NetworkManager[1354]:
<debug>
[1503915519.1711] connectivity: (eth0) check failed (6) Aug 28
10:18:39 ccimx6sbc daemon.debug NetworkManager[1354]: <debug> 
[1503915519.1799] connectivity: (wlan0) check failed (6)


it says the check failed. What do you see with level=TRACE logging?
Note comments here: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/Netwo
rkManager/plain/contrib/fedora/rpm/NetworkManager.conf?id=master


Aug 28 10:18:39 ccimx6sbc daemon.debug NetworkManager[1354]:
<debug>
[1503915519.1804] manager: connectivity checking indicates LIMITED 
Aug
28 10:18:39 ccimx6sbc daemon.debug NetworkManager[1354]: <debug> 
[1503915519.1807] dispatcher: (9) dispatching action
'connectivity-
change'
Aug 28 10:18:39 ccimx6sbc daemon.debug NetworkManager[1354]:
<debug>
[1503915519.2013] connectivity: (wlan0) sending request to 'http:// 
ne twork-test.debian.org/nm'
Aug 28 10:18:39 ccimx6sbc daemon.debug NetworkManager[1354]:
<debug>
[1503915519.2015] connectivity: (eth0) sending request to 'http://n 
et work-test.debian.org/nm'
Aug 28 10:18:39 ccimx6sbc daemon.info NetworkManager[1354]:
<info>  [1503915519.2107] connectivity: (eth0) timed out Aug 28
10:18:39 ccimx6sbc daemon.info NetworkManager[1354]:
<info>  [1503915519.2109] connectivity: (eth0) timed out Aug 28
10:18:39 ccimx6sbc daemon.info nm-dispatcher: req:1
'connectivity-change': new request (0 scripts) Aug 28 10:18:39 
ccimx6sbc daemon.debug nm-dispatcher: req:1
'connectivity-change': environment: CONNECTIVITY_STATE=LIMITED Aug
28
10:18:39 ccimx6sbc daemon.info nm-dispatcher: req:1
'connectivity-change': completed: no scripts

And in the routing table both interfaces have changed

Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric
Ref    Use Iface
0.0.0.0         10.101.2.1      0.0.0.0         UG    20100  0     
  
 0 eth0
0.0.0.0         192.168.11.101  0.0.0.0         UG    20600  0     
  
 0 wlan0
10.101.2.0      0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0     
  
 0 eth0
10.101.2.0      0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     100    0     
  
 0 eth0
192.168.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.0.0     U     0      0     
  
 0 wlan0
192.168.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.0.0     U     600    0     
  
 0 wlan0

Is there something wrong with our test or might there be an issue 
with the connectivity check?


there is also a curl 7.55 issue,
see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786432
What's your libcurl version?


best,
Thomas
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]