Re: Grrrr ... dhcpd6

[Gene Czarcinski <gene czarc net>]

On 09/28/2012 08:15 AM, Pavel Simerda wrote:
> You*may*  be right. But, unfortunately, I have been playing with DHCPv6
> implementations and there wasn't one that I would actually like. Except
> ISC DHCP which works for me but needs improvement.
Give dnsmasq a look.  It seems that not only NetworkManager using it as 
a caching name server but libvirt is using if not dependent on it.  
Granted, it is nothing I would like trying to scale to "industrial size" 
networks, but it sure configures and works well. As Dan pointed out in 
another message, there is sudden activity on the dnsmasq discussion 
mailinglist to get its RA support to work better ... maybe even suplant 
the need for radvd to configure routes when dhcp supplies the address 
and dynamic dns.

You might want to consider adding it to the suite of tests you use. For 
my testing, I am using both named/dhcpd/dhcpd6 and dnsmasq (both 
requiring radvd).

Gene