Re: dhcp6 and fqdn support (for dns)
- From: Gene Czarcinski <gene czarc net>
- To: networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: dhcp6 and fqdn support (for dns)
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:24:26 -0400
On 09/17/2012 12:05 PM, Jiri Popelka wrote:
On 09/16/2012 09:55 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
BTW, from the info in the dhcp-options man-page, I believe that
NetworkManager should be doing "send fqdn.fqdn" instead of "send
host-name" for IPv4. This should be with a plain name ... not a
qualified name. See the man-page.
The story behind this is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694758#c20 (NetworkManager)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697877 (initscripts)
OK, bug or feature?
Well, me and the original reporter of those bugs had suggested to
"send fqdn.fqdn" when $(hostname) was FQDN and "send host-name"
otherwise, but Bill Nottingham (initscripts) decided to always "send
host-name". So I thought it would be better for NM to stay consistent
with initscripts.
Read those BZs and if you think the behavior is wrong you could try to
re-open them.
I have not gone back to look into the history of what should or should
not be sent. I only looked at what is said in the current (Fedora 17,
dhcp-common-4.2.4-9.P1.fc17) dhcp-options man page.
------------
option fqdn.fqdn text;
Specifies the domain name that the client wishes to use. This can
be a fully-qualified domain name, or a single label. If there is no
trailing ´.´ character in the name, it is not fully-qualified, and
the server will generally update that name in some locally-defined domain.
-----------
It also says that "options fqdn.hostname" and "option fqdn.domainname"
should never be set.
When I got things to work, there was a lot of options in the lease file
in addition to fqdn. I am not sure exactly what needs to be specified
except that for IPv6 if I specify "-F <homtname>" on the dhclient
command line, things work. For IPv7 "-H <homename>" seems to work.
Regardless, as things now work I do not get dynamic dns update for IPv6
(works fine for IPv4). This has been with dnsmasq as the dns and dhcp
server. I am not setting up testing on qemu/kvm/libvirt with a guest
running named and dhcpd instead of dnsmasq. My expectation is that it
will not do dynamic dns either.
My reason for pushing this is that while using radvd to help with IPv6
address assignment works for a client-only situation, it soon falls
apart when I have a bunch of systems referring to each other. For IPv4
using addresses only is painful, for IPv6 it is impractical.
I believe that such situations will needs either a IPv6 dhcpd with DDNS
to named or a dnsmasq. I do not know, there might be other packages out
there but these seem to be common.
Gene
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]