答复: MM: Non QMI Huawei modems without PPP support?

["Fangxiaozhi (Franko)" <fangxiaozhi huawei com>]

Dear All:
	Yes, in future, Huawei 3G modems will more support ECM/NCM/MBIM device, but not PPP modem.
	In generally, there is a ECM/NCM/MBIM interface and several serial interfaces available(at least there is one serial interface, which is used to manage the device, called PCUI interface by Huawei).
	Currently, ECM/NCM/MBIM interface can support dial-up with both QMI and AT command at the same time. But in future, ECM/NCM/MBIM interface will more support to dial up with AT command, but not QMI.
	So I advise that now it is time to do same work to make ModemManager can support AT command dial-up for ECM/NCM/MBIM interface.
	The AT commands about the dial-up, it will be sent to device through the PCUI interface:
	1. connect:
		 AT^NDISDUP=1,1,"apn"[,<"username">,<"password">,<auth_type>] 
			------username, password and auth_type is optional.
			-----auth_type: 0: no auth, 1: PAP, 2: CHAP.
	2. disconnect:
		AT^NDISDUP=1,0
	3. connection state:
		1) auto report:(this report is sent by )
			<CR><LF> ^NDISSTAT: <stat>,,,<PDP_type>]<CR><LF><CR><LF>OK<CR><LF>
			-----stat: 0 disconnected, 1 connected
			-----PDP_type: "IPV4" or "IPV6"
			-----such as: ^NDISSTAT:1,,,"IPV4" 
					   ^NDISSTAT:0,,,"IPV4"
		2) query state:
			AT^NDISSTATQRY?
	
	Hope that these information above can help you.

Best Regards,
Franko Fang
				

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: networkmanager-list-bounces gnome org [mailto:networkmanager-list-bounces gnome org] 代表 Bj?rn Mork
发送时间: 2012年11月11日 23:14
收件人: Aleksander Morgado
抄送: Olof Ermis; networkmanager-list gnome org; Tommy Cheng
主题: Re: MM: Non QMI Huawei modems without PPP support?

Aleksander Morgado <aleksander lanedo com> writes:

> Hey Bjørn,
>
>> 
>> following up the recent discussions on libqmi regarding E3276 I am 
>> wondering if these modems could be supported without too much fuzz by 
>> ModemManager?
>> 
>> This is a typical example of such a device (after adding the 
>> necessary match to the cdc_ncm driver):
>> 
>> T:  Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=00 Cnt=01 Dev#=  3 Spd=480 MxCh= 0
>> D:  Ver= 2.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=64 #Cfgs=  1
>> P:  Vendor=12d1 ProdID=1506 Rev= 1.02
>> S:  Manufacturer=HUAWEI Technology
>> S:  Product=HUAWEI Mobile
>> C:* #Ifs= 4 Cfg#= 1 Atr=80 MxPwr=500mA
>> I:* If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=02 Prot=12 Driver=option
>> E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
>> E:  Ad=01(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=4ms
>> I:  If#= 1 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=02 Prot=16 Driver=cdc_ncm
>> E:  Ad=82(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=  64 Ivl=2ms
>> I:* If#= 1 Alt= 1 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=02 Prot=16 Driver=cdc_ncm
>> E:  Ad=82(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=  64 Ivl=2ms
>> E:  Ad=83(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
>> E:  Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=4ms
>> I:* If#= 2 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=08(stor.) Sub=06 Prot=50 Driver=
>> E:  Ad=03(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
>> E:  Ad=84(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
>> I:* If#= 3 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=08(stor.) Sub=06 Prot=50 Driver=
>> E:  Ad=04(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
>> E:  Ad=85(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
>> 
>> 
>> So, except for the Mass Storage functions, there is only one serial 
>> function and one CDC NCM function available.  And according to the 
>> Windows drvier inf, the serial function is intended for PCUI.  It is 
>> used to manage the CDC NCM function, and may not support PPP at 
>> all(?)
>> 
>> Ideally ModemManager should use the wwanX interface for data and the 
>> ttyUSBY device for control, using Huawei vendor specific AT commands 
>> to initiate and manage the connection.  The known commands specific 
>> to network device management are AFAIK
>> 
>> connect:
>> AT^NDISDUP=1,1,"apn"
>> 
>> disconnect:
>> AT^NDISDUP=1,0
>> 
>> check:
>> AT^DHCP?
>> 
>> The last command will return all addresses, but the firmware also 
>> support running DHCP over the network interface so using these is not 
>> necessary .  The command is still useful to check whether there is an 
>> active connection or not.
>> 
>> Is this something which can be supported relatively easy?
>> 
>> I do not know how common these devices are, but the E3276 is 
>> relatively new so there might be an increasing demand for this. Based 
>> on the Windows driver I expect there are also similar devices with a 
>> CDC ECM function instead of NCM, but I have not seen any example of those yet.
>> So I have so far only submitted a patch for cdc_ncm.
>> 
>> 
>
> It should not be very difficult to support these modems.
>
> First, we would need a way to guess whether the huawei modem is one of 
> this kind or not. If this modem replies to "AT+CLAC", please send back 
> that output.

Since I don't have any such modems, I am hoping Olof or Tommy can help with this?

> A first try would be to use "AT^NDISDUP=?", assuming that a proper 
> reply is given by this modem and not by the others.

That I am pretty sure will not work.  AT^NDISDUP is implemented in many other Huawei modems, including some you will want to support via QMI.

> Just
> wondering, we may actually be able to decide this looking at the 
> driver reported?

Probably, using some driver based heuristic like

  1) I got a wwanX interface => need some management interface

  2) Look at the driver of wwanX to guess what type of management interface
    to use:

   qmi_wwan => QMI over /dev/cdc-wdmY
   cdc_mbim => MBIM over /dev/cdc-wdmY
   (cdc_ncm or cdc_ether) and Ericsson => AT*ENAP etc over /dev/cdc-wdmY or /dev/ttyACMY
   (cdc_ncm or cdc_ether) and Huawei => AT^NDISDUP etc over /dev/ttyUSBY

And maybe other combinations you already support?  AFAIK, this is pretty much what you already do e.g. for the Ericsson (aka MBM) modems?
 
> Are you able to run current git master ModemManager to see how the 
> modem behaves w.r.t other things like messaging, registration and 
> such? A debug log would be very helpful, as well as the output of "mmcli -m 0".

Again, Olof or Tommy?

> Last but not least, if anyone can sponsor a couple of these new 
> devices for us to test with, that would be best :-)

Of course.  One could hope the vendors stepped in here.


Bjørn
_______________________________________________
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list