Re: ModemManager port grabbing rework

["Andrew Bird (Sphere Systems)" <ajb spheresystems co uk>]

On Tuesday 14 February 2012, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 13:02 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> > On 02/13/2012 09:33 PM, Andrew Bird (Sphere Systems) wrote:
> > >    Will this redesign allow you to change the udev rule assigned names
> > > 
> > > from
> > > ID_MM_ZTE_PORT_TYPE_MODEM
> > > to
> > > ID_MM_PORT_TYPE_MODEM
> > > etc? I don't think there can be any clash requiring a different
> > > namespace as the items are fully identified by Vendor / Product IDs
> > > already.
> > 
> > That is fine for me, but not sure if there is any reason for the vendor
> > namespace in port-type tags. Dan?
> 
> I think it's fine too; the question at the time was whether or not
> different modems had different port needs.  I think for now we have
> enough information to standardize the udev port type tags between
> vendors.
> 
Excellent news, I guess that's a 0.6 thing only? Are you changing anything 
else in the udev tagging, say AUX -> AT/QCDM or adding GPS port etc?

Thanks, Andrew