Re: Dropping support for libnl1 and libnl2?



On 06.12.2012 19:11, Dan Williams wrote:
> 
> So, given that libnl 3.2.7 has been out for almost a year (2012-01-20),
> and most major distros are packaging it (Ubuntu, OpenSUSE, Debian,
> Fedora, Gentoo, Arch), would anyone object to libnl >= 3.2.7 as a build
> requirement for the next release of NetworkManager?

With my Debian maintainer hat on: go for it.



-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]