Re: [PATCH 0/7] Various libnl related fixes
- From: Thomas Graf <tgraf redhat com>
- To: Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>
- Cc: networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Various libnl related fixes
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:29:10 +0200
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 17:08 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> All applied, thanks. Aliased nlmsg_datalen() to nlmsg_len() for libnl1.
> If that's not right, let me know and I'll fix it up (or patches
> accepted :).
What is the plan for functionality which is only available in libnl3 but
not in libnl2 or libnl1?
For example: Support for virtual link types is only available in libnl3
but will be required to support bonding, VLAN and bridging.
Why are we keeping libnl1 code around?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]