Em Sunday 03 July 2011, Lamarque Vieira Souza escreveu: > Em Saturday 02 July 2011, Dan Williams escreveu: > > Yeah, the applet and editor are two separate processes. We can send an > > Update() along anyway if you wish though, I simply had to make a > > behavior call at the time it was implemented, and we can change that > > behavior. Obviously agents should be smart enough to know when the > > incoming secrets are different than what they already have and possibly > > ignore the Update() if nothing has actually changed. > > > > If NM is passing the old secrets, that's clearly not cool, and we need > > to fix that. > > Well, a new Update() call is not necessary, I just need NM to call > Update() with the new secrets instead of the old ones. The attached patch > does exactly that and fix the problem for me. But NM's API does not allow > me to list all settings from a connection, I have to name them one by one, > so I created the patch only for NMSettingWirelessSecurity. I think you can > improve it to work with all other secret settings, right? Dan Willians, can you comment the patch I sent you last week? This problem is a show-stop for Plasma NM and I would like to have it solve as soon as possible. -- Lamarque V. Souza http://www.geographicguide.com/brazil.htm Linux User #57137 - http://counter.li.org/ http://planetkde.org/pt-br |