Re: 3GPP interface name in MM 0.6

[Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>]

On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 01:02 -0500, Joseph Gunn wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:40:21 -0600
> Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 17:15 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > > 
> > > According to the DBus specs [1], no element within a DBus interface can
> > > start with a digit... so "org.freedesktop.ModemManager1.Modem.3gpp" is a
> > > bad name. :-/
> ....
> > Hmm, forgot about that.  3GPP really is the name of the group under
> > which GSM, EDGE, UMTS, and LTE live, and I didn't think continuing to
> > call it Modem.Gsm was accurate.  Maybe Tgpp or ThreeGpp or M3gpp?  I
> > don't like those much either; any other suggestions?
> > 
> from the 3gpp site, http://www.3gpp.org/About-3GPP
> <quote>
> These technologies are constantly evolving through - what have become
> known as - Generations of commercial cellular/mobile systems
> </quote>
> so Cellular, or mobile?

Yeah, but CDMA/EVDO is also cellular and also mobile, but not 3GPP...
It's 3GPP2 and pretty different so we shouldn't be using the same
terminology for both.

Dan