Re: [PATCH 0/4] APN type and plan extensions for automatic provisioning

[Oleg Zhurakivskyy <oleg zhurakivskyy intel com>]

Hello Dan,

On 07/31/2011 01:59 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 22:10 -0400, Eric Shienbrood wrote:
> > Another way to do it:
> >
> >
> > <apn value="foo">
> >    <plan type="prepaid"/>
> >    <plan type="postpaid"/>
> >    <usage type="internet"/>
> >    <usage type="wap"/>
> > </apn>
> >
> >
> > That way, the plan types and the usage types can still be declared as
> > enumerations.
>
> That actually looks pretty good.  Oleg, does that look OK to you?  If
> so, lets rev the patchset Just One More Time and then I'll push it, I
> promise :)

Sure, that's fine. Please find the patch on the list.

I am not sure about the following, any opinions?

- Should we add <usage type="internet"/> and <"plan type="postpaid"/> for every 
such APN?
- Or should we assume that's default?

Regards,
Oleg
--
Intel Finland Oy
Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki
Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4
Domiciled in Helsinki