Re: NM vs. suspend/resume

From: Jirka Klimes <jklimes redhat com>
To: networkmanager-list gnome org
Cc: Neal Becker <ndbecker2 gmail com>
Subject: Re: NM vs. suspend/resume
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:58:52 +0200

On Friday 24 of September 2010 13:00:58 Neal Becker wrote:
> NetworkManager-0.8.1-6.git20100831.fc13.x86_64
> knetworkmanager-0.9-0.20.20100603.fc13.x86_64
> 
> When resumed, NM does not notice wired eth0 if when suspended it was
> running on wifi.  Restarting NM fixes it.
> 
> Or perhaps the problem is knetworkmanager not noticing the change?
> 

Could you grab NetworkManager logs (var/log/messages)?
Do you see the device in nm-tool output?

Jirka

Follow-Ups:
- Re: NM vs. suspend/resume
  - From: Neal Becker

References:
- NM vs. suspend/resume
  - From: Neal Becker

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]