Re: Network-Manager Trunk and Fedora 12

[Darren Albers <dalbers gmail com>]

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 21:47 -0400, Darren Albers wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 22:59 -0400, Darren Albers wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com> wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 20:10 -0500, Darren Albers wrote:
>> >> >> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com> wrote:
>> >> >> > On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 15:45 -0500, Darren Albers wrote:
>> >> >> >> Are there any testing packages I can install to enable Bluetooth DUN
>> >> >> >> support on Fedora 12?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The latest builds in koji should work; I've been doing some heavy
>> >> >> > ModemManager work the past week or two and thus there aren't any builds
>> >> >> > in a suitable state for F12 testing quite yet.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=157530
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Dan
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Sorry one further question, is it safe to use these builds with an
>> >> >> older version of ModemManager?   Safe obviously being a relatively
>> >> >> term considering it isn't even in testing yet but enough for someone
>> >> >> to play with?
>> >> >
>> >> > Yes, they should be pretty safe for versions of NM from 2010 or very
>> >> > late 2009.
>> >> >
>> >> > Dan
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Thanks Dan!  I actually tested it on Fedora 13 but ModemManager
>> >> doesn't seem to like how the Blackberry responds.   I filed a bug
>> >> report on it but as usual for Blackberry's they seem to respond a
>> >> little differently that what you expect.  In this case it responds
>> >> with:
>> >> ** Message: (rfcomm0) opening serial device...
>> >> ** (modem-manager:2729): DEBUG: (rfcomm0): probe requested by plugin 'Generic'
>> >> ** (modem-manager:2729): DEBUG: (rfcomm0): --> 'AT+GCAP<CR>'
>> >> ** (modem-manager:2729): DEBUG: (rfcomm0): <--
>> >> '+GCAP:<CR><LF><CR><LF>OK<CR><LF>'
>> >> ** (modem-manager:2729): DEBUG: (rfcomm0): --> 'AT+GCAP<CR>'
>> >> ** (modem-manager:2729): DEBUG: (rfcomm0): <--
>> >> '+GCAP:<CR><LF><CR><LF>OK<CR><LF>'
>> >> ** (modem-manager:2729): DEBUG: (rfcomm0): --> 'AT+GCAP<CR>'
>> >> ** (modem-manager:2729): DEBUG: (rfcomm0): <--
>> >> '+GCAP:<CR><LF><CR><LF>OK<CR><LF>'
>> >> ** (modem-manager:2729): DEBUG: (rfcomm0): --> 'ATI<CR>'
>> >> ** (modem-manager:2729): DEBUG: (rfcomm0): <-- 'Research In Motion BlackBerry
>> >> IP Modem<CR><LF><CR><LF>OK<CR><LF>'
>> >> ** (modem-manager:2729): DEBUG: (rfcomm0): --> 'AT+CPIN?<CR>'
>> >> ** (modem-manager:2729): DEBUG: (rfcomm0): <-- '+CPIN:
>> >> READY<CR><LF><CR><LF>OK<CR><LF>'
>> >> ** (modem-manager:2729): DEBUG: (rfcomm0): --> 'AT+CGMM<CR>'
>> >> ** (modem-manager:2729): DEBUG: (rfcomm0): <-- 'RIM BlackBerry Device
>> >> 4001507<CR><LF><CR><LF>OK<CR><LF>'
>> >> ** Message: (rfcomm0) closing serial device...
>> >>
>> >> I guess when it does this ModemManager doesn't recognize the response
>> >> from CGMM (Model Query?) so it doesn't go any further?  CPIN seems to
>> >> match what is expected in mm-generic-gsm.c but I can't seem to follow
>> >> what it expects from CGMM and where that is checked.
>> >
>> > It's not responding to GCAP so we don't actually know whether it's a
>> > CDMA or a GSM device.  What kind is yours?
>> >
>> > If yours is a GSM device, then that's great since it responds to AT+CPIN
>> > correctly and we'll know it's a GSM device with recent ModemManager
>> > versions.
>> >
>> > If yours is a CDMA device and it responds to AT+CPIN, then I hate the
>> > world and we'll have to figure something else out :)
>> >
>> > Dan
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> You can save your hate for more important things like bad wireless
>> cards then since it is a GSM device!   I can get a CDMA device to test
>> if you want to know how that kind of device responds.  So if a more
>> recent version of ModemManager is used it may recognize it as a Modem?
>
> Yeah, which I'll build today, hopefully.
>
> Dan
>
>
>

Great news, thank you!