Re: Vpnc pluggin needs "force-natt" option.
- From: Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>
- To: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala <sidhpurwala huzaifa gmail com>
- Cc: networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Vpnc pluggin needs "force-natt" option.
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:52:40 -0800
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 13:28 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Created a patch and it works for me.
>
> More details on the comment in the bug.
Committed and pushed to master and stable 0.7, thanks.
Dan
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 18:38 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > Hello all!
> >
> > I have a situation where vpnc is failing due to an incorrect
> setting in
> > the NetworkManager vpnc plugin. The situation is a
> condition where a
> > firewall or other non-NAT device is interfering with
> protocol 50 (esp)
> > and we need NAT-T even though we are not behind a NAT. As
> it so
> > happens, vpnc does support this. It's "NAT Traversal mode
> force-natt".
> > In those environments, cli invocation of vpnc works like a
> charm. But
> > there appears to be no way for the NetworkManager vpnc
> plugin to
> > configure and use this. The force-natt option is most
> likely to work in
> > the widest variety of environments at the cost of a slight
> overhead (UDP
> > encapsulation). OpenSWAN, StrongSWAN, Racoon, and vpnc all
> support
> > this. Just need the plugin adapted to support it as well.
> Any chance
> > of getting that added to that plugin?
>
>
> Seems pretty simple; to make sure it doesn't get lost I've
> created:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611027
>
> Can't promise when, but it would be a good simple bug for a
> new
> contributor to pick up.
>
> Dan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetworkManager-list mailing list
> NetworkManager-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]