ath5k?
- From: list phuk ath cx
- To: networkmanager-list <networkmanager-list gnome org>
- Subject: ath5k?
- Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:13:21 +0100
Hello,
I have an AR5212 WLAN adapter that runs with the ath5k driver from linux
2.6.31. I've tried NM 0.7.1 and 0.7.1_p20090824, and both fail to
operate that card correctly. It works flawlessly with wicd or
wpa_supplicant, but in nm-applet it says "device not ready".
In syslog I see:
Oct 26 00:42:47 wiese NetworkManager: <info> starting...
Oct 26 00:42:47 wiese NetworkManager: <info> Found radio killswitch
/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/pci_168c_1014_rfkill_phy0_wlan
Oct 26 00:42:47 wiese NetworkManager: <info> (wlan0): driver supports
SSID scans (scan_capa 0x01).
Oct 26 00:42:47 wiese NetworkManager: <info> (wlan0): new 802.11 WiFi
device (driver: 'ath5k')
Oct 26 00:42:47 wiese NetworkManager: <info> (wlan0): exported as
/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/net_00_05_4e_47_24_10
Oct 26 00:42:47 wiese NetworkManager: <info> Trying to start the
supplicant...
Oct 26 00:42:47 wiese NetworkManager: <info> Trying to start the system
settings daemon...
Oct 26 00:42:52 wiese [25148.952901] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is
not ready
Oct 26 00:42:52 wiese [25148.953399] e1000: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000
Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
Oct 26 00:42:52 wiese NetworkManager: <info> (wlan0): device state
change: 1 -> 2 (reason 2)
Oct 26 00:42:52 wiese NetworkManager: <info> (wlan0): bringing up device.
Oct 26 00:42:52 wiese [25148.986093] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is
not ready
Oct 26 00:42:52 wiese NetworkManager: <info> (wlan0): preparing device.
Oct 26 00:42:52 wiese NetworkManager: <info> (wlan0): deactivating
device (reason: 2).
Oct 26 00:42:52 wiese NetworkManager: supplicant_interface_acquire:
assertion `mgr_state == NM_SUPPLICANT_MANAGER_STATE_IDLE' failed
BTW, this happens now after I changed the system from Ubuntu 9.04 to
Gentoo for performance reasons. In Ubuntu it used to work (also with
ath5k). I have no idea if they patched nm or ath5k what else they might
do differently.
thanks for any hints...
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]