Re: NM stopped using local caching nameserver?



Quoting Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>:

On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 10:12 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
I tracked this down some..  It appears part of the issue is a
race condition between named and dbus.  The startup sequence
has named start first, and then dbus...  but then named doesn't
connect to dbus properly.  If I RESTART named then everything
appears to work okay.

I suspect the problem here is that named doesn't retry to connect
to dbus if it fails to connect on startup.

Would this be a named bug?

Well, probably an init ordering between named and dbus initscripts,
yeah.

dan

I tried various re-orderings and something or other seemed to fail
when I changed the order.  I fixed it by adding a named restart
to rc.local.  Annoying, but it works.  Ideally, named should
just try to reconnect to dbus.

-derek
--
      Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
      Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
      URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
      warlord MIT EDU                        PGP key available



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]