Re: vpn properties library path hardcoded into the service file

[Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>]

On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 13:03 -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Looks like this was a conscious choice 2 years ago based on the 
> changelog for nm-vpnc-service.name.in but this causes a weird multilib 
> issue.  See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447577
> 
> Is there a reason why we don't simply let dlopen look in the library 
> path?  Or better yet, why don't we just link against the library?

Letting dlopen find it is a good idea.  Linking against the library
wasn't a good idea, because the library is a Gnome/GTK library, and the
VPN services are supposed to be desktop agnostic (not that they are
perfect at this).

Dan