Re: Another dropped connection with iwl3945 and NM-0.6.5 on FC7

[Derek Atkins <warlord MIT EDU>]

Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com> writes:

> On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 19:02 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
>> Here's the dmesg output:
>> 
>> eth1: RX deauthentication from 00:19:a9:47:56:91 (reason=1)
>> eth1: deauthenticated
>> eth1: authenticate with AP 00:19:a9:47:56:91
>> eth1: RX authentication from 00:19:a9:47:56:91 (alg=0 transaction=2 status=0)
>> eth1: authenticated
>> eth1: associate with AP 00:19:a9:47:56:91
>> eth1: RX ReassocResp from 00:19:a9:47:56:91 (capab=0x1 status=0 aid=80)
>> eth1: associated
>> eth1: WMM queue=2 aci=0 acm=0 aifs=3 cWmin=15 cWmax=1023 burst=0
>> eth1: WMM queue=3 aci=1 acm=0 aifs=7 cWmin=15 cWmax=1023 burst=0
>> eth1: WMM queue=1 aci=2 acm=0 aifs=2 cWmin=7 cWmax=15 burst=30
>> eth1: WMM queue=0 aci=3 acm=0 aifs=2 cWmin=3 cWmax=7 burst=15
>> eth1: No ProbeResp from current AP 00:19:a9:47:56:91 - assume out of range
>> eth1: No STA entry for own AP 00:19:a9:47:56:91
>> eth1: No STA entry for own AP 00:19:a9:47:56:91
>> bridge-eth1: disabling the bridge
>> bridge-eth1: down
>> bridge-eth1: enabling the bridge
>> bridge-eth1: up
>
> Looks like the driver decided that the AP had gone away.  It probably
> missed too many beacons or probe responses due to the RF heavy
> environment or something?  Could need a driver tweak.

Maybe.  It's the iwl3945.  Maybe it was scanning? ;)
The IETF really is a great testbed.  Frustrating as a user,
but a great testbed.

> Dan

-derek

-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       warlord MIT EDU                        PGP key available