Re: vpnc and determining correct routes

[Derek Atkins <warlord MIT EDU>]

Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com> writes:

>> Just to don't get you wrong. The split-net routing is not working
>> without manually setting routes yet, right? As this it was Thomas was
>> talking about.
>
> Right.  Split DNS doesn't work at all yet.

Oh really??  It seems to work just fine for me!  I'm running a local
caching nameserver in FC5 and it's NM + VPNC + Bind is routing DNS
queries for CISCO_DEF_DOMAIN over the VPN to the VPN-declared
nameservers but everything else goes out over the main network.  It
works great!  I just hand-hacked the VPNC helper app to change
CISCO_DEF_DOMAIN so it has two domains instead of one domain.

So in what way does this not work?  Or is it working for me
specifically because I'm running named?

-derek
-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       warlord MIT EDU                        PGP key available