wpa_supplicant and ipw2100
- From: Ian Campbell <ian dal-acm ca>
- To: networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: wpa_supplicant and ipw2100
- Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 21:20:18 -0400
Figured I'd give NM 0.6.0 a try with my ipw2100.
Setup wpa_supplicant.conf the way I remembered seeing somewhere on this list,
although for the life of me I can't find it now.
ctrl_interface=/var/run/wpa_supplicant
ctrl_interface_group=0
eapol_version=1
ap_scan=1
fast_reauth=1
wpa_supplicant is started like this:
wpa_supplicant -i eth1 -Dwext -c/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf -dd
... and it keeps spitting out this:
RTM_NEWLINK, IFLA_IFNAME: Interface 'eth1' added
Wireless event: cmd=0x8b06 len=8
Wireless event: cmd=0x8b1a len=14
Wireless event: cmd=0x8b15 len=20
Wireless event: new AP: 00:11:95:6b:6e:fe
State: DISCONNECTED -> ASSOCIATED
Associated to a new BSS: BSSID=00:11:95:6b:6e:fe
No keys have been configured - skip key clearing
No network configuration found for the current AP
State: ASSOCIATED -> DISCONNECTED
wpa_driver_wext_disassociate
No keys have been configured - skip key clearing
EAPOL: External notification - portEnabled=0
EAPOL: External notification - portValid=0
RTM_NEWLINK, IFLA_IFNAME: Interface 'eth1' added
Wireless event: cmd=0x8b15 len=20
Wireless event: new AP: 00:00:00:00:00:00
BSSID 00:11:95:6b:6e:fe blacklist count incremented to 3
State: DISCONNECTED -> DISCONNECTED
EAPOL: External notification - portEnabled=0
EAPOL: External notification - portValid=0
CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED - Disconnect event - remove keys
wpa_driver_wext_set_key: alg=0 key_idx=0 set_tx=0 seq_len=0 key_len=0
wpa_driver_wext_set_key: alg=0 key_idx=1 set_tx=0 seq_len=0 key_len=0
wpa_driver_wext_set_key: alg=0 key_idx=2 set_tx=0 seq_len=0 key_len=0
wpa_driver_wext_set_key: alg=0 key_idx=3 set_tx=0 seq_len=0 key_len=0
wpa_driver_wext_set_key: alg=0 key_idx=0 set_tx=0 seq_len=0 key_len=0
... well, except the blacklist count keeps incrementing.
It doesn't appear to be setting the WEP key, so it doesn't associate.
Still happily runs dhclient though.
What am I doing wrong?
Does it matter what order nm-applet and wpa_supplicant are started in? It
doesn't work for me right now in either order, but I was curious.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]