Re: NM tidbits
- From: Robert Love <rml novell com>
- To: Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>
- Cc: networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: NM tidbits
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:11:14 -0500
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 17:01 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> Except that Enable Wireless turns off wireless completely! Enable
> Wireless _is_ "airplane mode" essentially. WRT to scanning, the
> decision was that you will never be able to turn off scanning, that NM
> will scan every now and again based on some heuristics. Scanning every
> 2 minutes doesn't really take that much power, and people who think it's
> unnecessary can simply deal with it.
Good point.
So I think I'd like to have an option to disconnect cleanly and turn
everything off. If 'Wireless Enabled' in that case is redundant and not
needed, I can remove it.
Your thoughts?
> Right, we can do this. I had intentionally kept the current model to be
> less-smart on the wpa_supplicant front for (a) simplicity, and (b)
> consistency. ie, we want to make sure where the bugs are, and what
> exactly wpa_supplicant can do before we open it up and let
> wpa_supplicant be "smart" about stuff. Error reporting is still
> something of a concern here, but that will only get better with time.
Nod.
> Note that WEP still needs to be hard-coded since you can't ever know
> that an access point supports only 40-bit WEP rather than 104-bit, or
> whether it's using Shared Key or Open System until you try to connect to
> it. But at least they nailed that bit with WPA.
Yah, just for WPA we can offer a "WPA (Auto)" mode or similar. But
fixing any bugs are a bigger concern.
Any opinion on the other issues?
I'll start drafting NEWS -- we have a lot new. ;-)
Robert Love
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]