Re: WEP vs WPA
- From: "Darren Albers" <dalbers gmail com>
- To: akonstam sbcglobal net
- Cc: networkmanager-list <networkmanager-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: WEP vs WPA
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 08:06:57 -0400
Rather than try and explain it myself here are a couple of links on the subject:
http://www.openxtra.co.uk/articles/wep-weaknesses.php
http://www.opus1.com/www/whitepapers/whatswrongwithwep.pdf
On 4/18/06, Aaron Konstam <akonstam sbcglobal net> wrote:
>
>
> I must be losing something is the WEP vs wpa discussion. wpa is supposed
> to be more secure than WEP, However currently my WEP access at home is
> secured by a 13 character (128 bit) passwd. In addition there the
> keyring string. That seems pretty secure to me.
>
> Could someone explain why this security is so compromisable that the
> added trouble of wpa is worth doing?
> --
> Aaron Konstam <akonstam sbcglobal net>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetworkManager-list mailing list
> NetworkManager-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]