Re: Initial libnl support committed

On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 23:24 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:

> You can get libnl-1.0-pre3 from here:

This webpage does not instill an overwhelming sense of confidence in the
stability or long-term viability of libnl.

Is this solid code?  Is anything else using it?  I have never even heard
of it.

Rough glance, the change is hundreds of lines, with a net savings of
about 30.  Is that worth a new library and dependency, which neither of
our distributions are as of yet packaging?

	Robert Love

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]