Re: NM gets it wrong
- From: Tim Niemueller <tim niemueller de>
- To: Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>
- Cc: NetworkManager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: NM gets it wrong
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:06:02 +0100
Dan Williams wrote:
>
> Right, this is all an artifact of the vpnc implementation. In vpnc, the
> PtP and local address are the same. This was something only a second
> VPN implementation could find :)
>
> The NMIP4Config structure doesn't have an entry for PtP addresses.
> We'll likely need to add one and also augment the vpn-service -> NM API
> to deal with that, so that each individual vpn service can do what it
> wants to with that. Which variable is the "server" address that gets
> passed from OpenVPN to your helper? Is it VPNGATEWAY?
Yes, it's VPNGATEWAY. The local IP address is stored in ip4_address.
Even if the local IP and the remote are the same for VPN, why is it not
sufficient to have the ip4_gateway set to the remote gateway and
ip4_address to the local address? What are the semantics of these fields?
>
> We should probably bug davidz about this one...
bug bug ;-)
Tim
--
Tim Niemueller <tim niemueller de> www.niemueller.de
=================================================================
Imagination is more important than knowledge. (Albert Einstein)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]