Re: [PATCH 1/6] xstat: Add a pair of system calls to make extended file stats available
- From: David Howells <dhowells redhat com>
- To: Andreas Dilger <adilger dilger ca>
- Cc: linux-cifs vger kernel org, linux-nfs vger kernel org, nautilus-list gnome org, libc-alpha sourceware org, kfm-devel kde org, wine-devel winehq org, samba-technical lists samba org, dhowells redhat com, linux-api vger kernel org, linux-fsdevel vger kernel org, linux-ext4 vger kernel org
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] xstat: Add a pair of system calls to make extended file stats available
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:32:36 +0100
Andreas Dilger <adilger dilger ca> wrote:
> > The idea was initially proposed as a set of xattrs that could be
> > retrieved with getxattr(), but the general preferance proved to be
> > for new syscalls with an extended stat structure.
>
> I would comment that it was the opposite. It was originally a
> stat()-like extension that degraded into a messy getxattr() mess.
Ummm... No, my first attempt was definitely through getxattr(). You even
commented on it.
> > The fields in struct xstat come in a number of classes:
> >
> > (0) st_dev, st_blksize, st_information.
> >
> > These are local data and are always available.
>
> For the extra two bits it would cost us, I don't think st_blksize
> and st_information should always be returned.
Fair enough.
> st_blksize may be variable for a distributed filesystem,
I wonder if there's a way to make this explicit - or is it something that if
the bit isn't set, you can't use the value in st_blksize. I wonder if this
value always has to be non-zero to make sure existing stat() doesn't explode.
> and some of the fields in st_information (offline) may not be free to access
> either.
True.
David
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]