=?us-ascii?Q?Re=3AThumbnail=20regression?=
- From: vitko post cz
- To: Jason Taylor <killerkiwi2005 gmail com>
- Cc: nautilus-list gnome org
- Subject: Re:Thumbnail regression
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:30:14 +0100 (CET)
> It looks like all thumbnails have frames again... this is a regression from
> 2.20
Do you mean "thumbnails of _small_ pictures"? Yes, small images up to thumbnail
size should be used in "life" size and without framing.
Larger images should be thumbnailed and framed (framing was actually broken
in 2.20 and fixed later).
(If I'm wrong, please correct me.)
Vit
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
