Re: gio, gvfs and nautilus fixes
- From: nf2 <nf2 scheinwelt at>
- To: David Zeuthen <davidz redhat com>
- Cc: nautilus-list gnome org, Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>, Frederic Crozat <fcrozat mandriva com>
- Subject: Re: gio, gvfs and nautilus fixes
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:17:44 +0100
David Zeuthen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 15:35 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
I'm not sure everyone wants everything under /mnt show up as "user
visisble" volumes. Its an old-style unix thing and may well contain
"implementation-specific" mountpoints that are symlinked into from other
places (something /usr -> /mnt/hdb1/usr for instance).
I'll let davidz reply with his opinions on this.
Only showing stuff from /media and $HOME is _a lot_ easier to explain to
users. /mnt is historically difficult to handle as some people put stuff
in there and don't want it to be shown; we don't have that problem
with /media. For /media we can simply tell people to move it to /mnt..
so if we showed /mnt we wouldn't be able to tell people to move it
somewhere sanely (/srv doesn't really count).
FWIW, I'm even opposed to a configure option, distros shouldn't behave
different. If a distro, for gods know what reason, what to show stuff
in /mnt they can patch the source.
That's my opinion anyway.
David
I wonder if a low-level system like GIO should really decide about
volume visibility or rather provide the info to let the front-end
decide. For instance in KIO-GIObridge i only want to filter the remote
GVFS mounts. At the moment i am achieving this with listing only the
mounts which don't point to file://, but that looks like a hack. A nicer
solution - i think - would be some kind of "domain" attribute for
volumes and mounts ("remote-vfs", "removable-media", "local", "fuse"...)
Regards,
Norbert
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]