Re: patch nag: Multithreaded thumbnail loading
- From: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- To: Christian Neumair <cneumair gnome org>
- Cc: nautilus-list <nautilus-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: patch nag: Multithreaded thumbnail loading
- Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 10:57:11 +0200
On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 11:59 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
> I've attached a patch to bug 104224 [1] that implements multithreaded
> thumbnail loading. I'd appreciate some comments.
>
> Do not confuse this with the thumbnail cache issue discusses in recent
> blog entries, we'll implement another solution to that.
>
> [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104224
It seems a bit late in the game for this release, but seems like a good
idea.
Some quick comments from just glancing over the patch:
I don't think the immediate_thumb_loading argument is needed. We should
just always read it async.
Why are you implementing thumbnail reading as a thread? Why not use the
existing async i/o machinery in gnome-vfs.
thumbnail_loading_thread_func() uses a lot of nautilus stuff in a
thread, which is not possible. Nautilus just is not threadsafe in this
fashion. Threads can only do really low-level stuff.
Does is_loading_thumbnail really need to be its own thing? Can't we just
re-use is_thumbnailing (that is after all what we're doing from a
highlevel perspective).
Maybe break out the is_loading pixbuf generation code to a helper
function.
Maybe the nautilus_thumbnail_prioritize() stuff can be used or extended
to prioritize loading of thumbnails for currently visible icons.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]