Re: Update to new emblem sizes

[Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>]

On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 13:17 +0200, Jakub Steiner wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 12:30 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> 
> > Looking at the current gnome-icon-theme there are still 32x32 icons in
> > the 48x48/emblems folder. Like for instance emblem-danger.png.
> 
> Hi Alex,
> Sorry for the late reply. Indeed the 48x48 still has legacy icons we
> want to phase out gradually, just like */stock. But if we want to treat
> emblems like regular icons, shipping them with an icon theme, I stand by
> keeping the same size logic.
> 
> As for how to do the scaling of emblems in nautilus, take a peek at how
> Xfce's Thunar does it. I believe it it follows dobey's suggestion to use
> a quater of the icon area. I also don't think the emblems are readable
> at icon sizes of 24x24px and lower (Thunar does use them still). If you
> think we need them there, we need to provide the tiny resolutions of the
> emblems as scaling down to 8x8px doesn't work at all.
> 
> icon			emblem
> -------------------------------
> 96x96px and above	48x48px
> 64x64px			32x32px
> 48x48px			24x24px
> 32x32px			16x16px
> no emblems for smaller sizes

I implemented this in svn. It seems to work ok for the "new size" icons.
Could you ensure that all of them are in the right directory according
to the new system?