Am Donnerstag, den 15.09.2005, 13:36 +0000 schrieb Steve Blackwell: > On 09/15/2005 09:32:20 AM, Christian Neumair wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 15.09.2005, 12:57 +0000 schrieb Steve Blackwell: > > > On 09/15/2005 12:02:14 AM, dinoop thomas wrote: > > > > > Ah-ha! Last month I reported a similar problem I was having when I > > > upgraded to Fedora Core 4 > > > > > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/nautilus-list/2005-August/msg00047.html > > > > > > So now I know what the reason is, is there any way to get my > > desktop > > > > > icons back? > > > > That sounds seriously broken. I suppose that the underlying VFS is > > somehow broken rather than nautilus. > > > > What does entering > > gnomevfs-info /home/steve > > in a terminal return? > > > $ gnomevfs-info /home/steve > Name : steve > Type : Directory > MIME type : x-directory/normal > (...) That looks totally normal. If you have gdb installed, a bit debugging experience and packages with debugging symbols installed (cf. [1]), I would like you to hook nautilus_view_factory_view_supports_uri and give us the invocation details (the parameter values), and what the value of view_info is after the factory is looked up. [1] http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces/DistroSpecificInstructions -- Christian Neumair <chris gnome-de org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part