Re: [PATCH] Show "No subfolders" in tree view instead of "empty" when only showing folders

[Lukas Kolbe <lucky knup de>]

On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 13:08:34 +0200, martin wehner wrote:

> So, back it out? It'd be ok with me - While I see the potential danger of it 
> being misleading, after seeing it in action I agree that it doesn't look too 
> hot. The "No Subfolders" string is a bit too wide for the tree and I guess 
> it could get really wide in some translations: "(Keine Unterverzeichnisse)" 
> in German for example. So most of the time the label will get cropped 
> anyway.
>

So, what about simply _not_ providing a mark to open the subfolders when
there _are_ no subfolders? I mean, would this be so hard/inefficient?
I personally find it just not nice to be able to unfold a folder in the
treeview, just to see that it has no subfolders.

-- 
Lukas