Am Freitag, den 08.07.2005, 18:32 +0200 schrieb Alexander Larsson: > On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 17:43 +0200, David Christian Berg wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 15:24 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 11:24 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote: > > > > Am Dienstag, den 28.06.2005, 10:18 +0200 schrieb Markus Bertheau: > > > > > Dnia 28-06-2005, Di o godzinie 08:55 +0200, Baptiste Mille-Mathias > > > > > napisał(a): > > > > > > > > > > > Nautilus doesn't support anymore this feature. This is now the Web > > > > > > browser's job. > > > > > > I closed your bug. > > > > > > > > > > I think you misunderstood Thomas. He doesn't want the web page to be > > > > > displayed in nautilus itself, but for nautilus to start the application > > > > > that handles the http protocol. > > > > > > > > The attached patch should help. > > > > > > Is this sort of behaviour actually needed? Do we really expect people to > > > type in filenames in the location bar in the filemanager? > > > > It's sort of nice to do so, because tab completion allows you to access > > the right file easily via the location bar. Maybe a little geeky, but > > it's not drawback for other users. > > For geeks the run dialog works for typing a filename too. Just alt-f2 + > filename (with completion). Doesn't even need a nautilus window around. I don't see why we shouldn't offer external apps as a fallback if Nautilus can't display an URI. People obviously want [1,2] this feature. The onliest reason why one would like to see why displaying a particular location by Nautilus failed is for debugging purposes, and since we (hooray for OSS!) have printf debugging, there is IMHO no reason to display this dialog if we haven't utilized all available funds for doing what the user wants - displaying an URI. [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309127 [2] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309759 -- Christian Neumair <chris gnome-de org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil