Re: Rethinking emblems



On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 09:45 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Le mardi 05 avril 2005 à 09:39 +0200, Alexander Larsson a écrit :
> 
> > I think the emblem + watermark duo works best where it has additional
> > semantic value. Essentially where you have manually said that this
> > folder (and below it) is meant for some specific purpose (say, a
> > project, or whatever). Using it for auto-generated information is more
> > likely to just clutter stuff up.
> 
> You may stick several emblems together on a single file. How does that
> translate for watermarks ?

I dunno. It might work by having multiple watermarks next to each other,
but that might look strange.

Another thing would be to separate "plain" emblems from emblem with a
watermark, and only allow one of the later for a directory.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc 
                   alexl redhat com    alla lysator liu se 
He's an underprivileged ninja dog-catcher who hides his scarred face behind a 
mask. She's a time-travelling gypsy socialite from a family of eight older 
brothers. They fight crime! 




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]