El jue, 11-03-2004 a las 03:29, Alexander Larsson escribió: > On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 06:05, Ryan McDougall wrote: > > Hi, > > I recently had some strange permissions on a bunch of music files. I > > thought I would fix them by selecting them all, and setting the correct > > permissions via nautilus. Un-selecting partially selected check boxes, > > selecting un-selected boxes, etc., is a *very* slow procedure (approx 30 > > seconds per click). Doing a similar operation via command line took only > > a second. > > > > I was wondering if the operation could be sped up by buffering change > > requests by maintaining a mask of composite changes and only applying > > after a timeout, or upon the dialogue being closed. Do usability or > > other pitfalls lie that way? > > I'm sure its possible, with a bit of care taken. Anyone want to try? (We > should probably use a timeout, not wait until the dialog is closed, as > that is what instant apply should do) And prevent the dialog from being closed while an apply op is executing... perhaps graying out the dialog and showing a text label saying "Applying permissions ... dialog will close when it's finished..." what do you say? > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc > alexl redhat com alla lysator liu se > He's a scrappy pirate card sharp moving from town to town, helping folk in > trouble. She's a blind gypsy cab driver living homeless in New York's sewers. > They fight crime! -- Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) GPG key ID: 0xC1033CAD at keyserver.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente