Re: THE LINUX REMOVABLE DEVICE PETITION

[Ikke <nicolas trangez gmail com>]

> Gnome-VFS is the wrong place for this, because the special umount
> command which suspends monitoring needs to become standard for all
> desktops. The lightweight ones also. There should be no
> GNOME-dependencies. It needs to be tiny and simple - to get widely
> adopted.
Thats what I think too.

> FAM really needs a control and status API.
> 
> Btw, what do you think of a gerneric "libdirmonitoring"-API, which sits
> on top of FAM and provides the "smumount" (Suspend monitoring and
> umount) function. Such a generic layer could also help to replace FAM
> lateron.
That's +- what we tried to achieve in libProcNotification I guess. At
a certain level. Or do I understand you wrong now?

Greets, Nicolas

-- 
Ivman dev - http://ivman.sourceforge.net
Blogging @ http://blog.eikke.com