Re: [PATCH] gnome-vfs: Don't monitor read-only filesystems
- From: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- To: John McCutchan <ttb tentacle dhs org>
- Cc: Nautilus <nautilus-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnome-vfs: Don't monitor read-only filesystems
- Date: 06 Feb 2004 14:43:44 +0100
On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 17:13, John McCutchan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 09:18:54AM +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > Hmmm. Nautilus already does this. However, there was a race condition on
> > mount which made this not always work, which i fixed last week.
> >
> > Maybe the check makes more sense in gnome-vfs than nautilus though,
> > since other apps can monitor stuff. I'm not sure about returning an
> > error though. Nautilus just makes a monitor that never signals any
> > change.
>
> I think it makes more sense in gnome-vfs, the recent-files stuff
> monitors all files in the list, which causes problems when unmounting
> cdroms. I am not that familiar with gnome-vfs code, what result should
> the code return in this situation?
It should succeed and never send any change events. Thats the same
semantics as now, only using less effort and not hogging the cdrom. Of
course, this adds an extra couple of stats to each monitor, so monitor
creation performance is down.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
alexl redhat com alla lysator liu se
He's an uncontrollable dishevelled cowboy with a mysterious suitcase
handcuffed to his arm. She's a pregnant winged barmaid trying to make a
difference in a man's world. They fight crime!
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]