On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 15:11, MArk Finlay wrote: > Well if it was decided that manual layout is a useful feature that is > worth keeping, then I guess that this might be a sutable compromise. I guess what I was trying to convey in my email before was that it's not so much manual layout that's useful (e.g. I want this icon at exactly 216X341 over) so much as manual ordering (e.g. I want these folders to always be listed on the top row, these folders always listed in the next row)... which is why I was suggesting that not ditch manual layout (which by definition entails manual ordering) until we have a "snap-to-grid" where layout is done automatically but ordering is done manually... -jag -- --------------------------------------------------------- Joshua Adam Ginsberg Cellphone: 970.749.8530 Rice University '02 Email: joshg myrealbox com St. Mark's School of Texas '98 -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin ---------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part