Re: nautilus remote (non)performance ...
- From: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- To: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- Cc: GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, nautilus <nautilus-list eazel com>
- Subject: Re: nautilus remote (non)performance ...
- Date: 04 Sep 2002 10:57:04 +0100
On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 21:15, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > Concievably it'd be quicker to use the anti-aliased canvas here;
>
> Aha... How easy would a switch to the non-AA canvas be, for testing?
Impossible, the code was removed in favour of a pure Gdk based
approach; quite what the rational was behind this I don't know - I
believe gtk+ is mooted as providing a canvas like model now. Sadly it
seems to do this by endless X server roundtrips.
Indeed; by accurate measuring (with sticky tape) I see that rendering 8
icons takes ~130ms:
[pid 7793] 1031079385.407424 access("drawpixbuf start", F_OK) = -1
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
...
[pid 7793] 1031079385.539125 access("draw canvas item end", F_OK) = -1
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
These 8 happening to be in a row un-interrupted by other threads; which
seems a little excessive to me - only a few of these had emblems.
Regards,
Michael.
--
mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]