Re: desktop font + PATCH for 82565

[Dave Bordoley <bordoley msu edu>]

It would be also be nice if the list view behaved this way as well.

dave

On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 01:00, Dave Bordoley wrote:
> yeah icons at 25% is pretty crack anyway. No one is going to use it,
> same for 200%. Well conceivably someone with bad eye site may choose to
> use large icons, but they would most likely set a large size as the
> default anyway. So this seem like a pretty sane idea imho.
> 
> dave
> 
> On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 00:45, David Watson wrote:
> > That's not a bad idea.  In fact I sort of like it better then adding
> > another preference.  It would only be a partial fix though.  The extreme
> > zoom levels could still end up looking funny (this problem is basically
> > why Eazel had the font_size_at_default_zoom_level preference).
> > 
> > Maybe it's good enough though...  (It would be for me anyway, I don't plan
> > on setting the default zoom level to anything crazy like 25% or 200%)
> >