Re: desktop font + PATCH for 82565

[Dave Bordoley <bordoley msu edu>]

yeah icons at 25% is pretty crack anyway. No one is going to use it,
same for 200%. Well conceivably someone with bad eye site may choose to
use large icons, but they would most likely set a large size as the
default anyway. So this seem like a pretty sane idea imho.

dave

On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 00:45, David Watson wrote:
> That's not a bad idea.  In fact I sort of like it better then adding
> another preference.  It would only be a partial fix though.  The extreme
> zoom levels could still end up looking funny (this problem is basically
> why Eazel had the font_size_at_default_zoom_level preference).
> 
> Maybe it's good enough though...  (It would be for me anyway, I don't plan
> on setting the default zoom level to anything crazy like 25% or 200%)
>