[Nautilus-list] Re: what "must" be done for gnome 2.0?

[Darin Adler <darin bentspoon com>]

On 3/7/02 12:01 AM, "David Fallon" <davef tetsubo com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 23:32, Darin Adler wrote:
>> On 3/6/02 10:33 PM, "David Fallon" <davef tetsubo com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Can I get some clarity on what "must" be done for gnome 2.0?
>> 
>> Here's my formulation, roughly from most important to least:
>> 
>>     #1: Crashes doing normal stuff
>>     #2: Slowness doing normal stuff
>>     #3: Things that are worse than they were in 1.X -- new bug or feature
>> lost in the translation
>>     #4: Crashes doing unusual stuff
>>     #5: Any other egregious problems that were present in 1.X but would be
>> an embarrassment to the entire Gnome project if left broken
> 
> Okay, excellent. How do I then prioritize these appropriately in
> bugzillla? Or would you prefer the lists I've sent out?

A bug that's in any of these 5 categories gets a keyword of GNOME2 and a
milestone of 1.1.x. A bug that's not, gets a milestone of future.

    -- Darin